Skip to main content

Obama With His Mask Off


      Obama 2012
The proposed medical legislation is far to complicated for me to understand. Since it requires some 2400 closely typed pages of convoluted and cross referenced text - I am sure I would forget the first pages by the time I got to page 1019 or so.  Like me, many of you probably rely on the summaries and interpretations of others.   Unfortunately, they often tend to be politically biased. Somehow this legislation has been turned into a partisan issue when it never should have been. The matter of improving Amreica's health care is important to all of us and not just the Democrats. From the beginning it has been driven by the far, far left liberals with little, if any, input from the more conservative middle. The result is a bill that satisfies no one.

I first thought that the legislation was so wildly expensive and that it should be shot down regardless of it's merit. I really objected to the WAY it was drawn up (liberal input only), and to the rush to pass it before anyone had an opportunity to read it (or understand it), and especially the borrowing beyond the capacity for OUR generation to pay for it.

It is time for America to live within it's means. Our economy is already stretched thin and our financial condition is declining in relation to other world currencies. Since our printed dollars have no valuable commodity backing them - it is especially important that we keep our dollar relatively strong.

For all of these reasons, this current health care initiative should fail.




Comments

Rain said…
I agree that as it stands, it should fail but if we do nothing, it's going to grow worse. I am unhappy that the Democrats joined the Republicans with making their main concern keeping profits high for insurance and pharmaceutical companies. None of them care about the people who cannot afford insurance and a requirement to buy it just makes it worse.

They say they fixed some things like not allowing an insurance company to deny someone because of preexisting conditions. Instead they let them charge up to 400% more in premiums which means you might be able to buy it but you cannot afford it. It goes on that way. I have to wonder if we really have two parties in anything but name. One blocks everything that might cut into insurance companies profits, protecting the biggest companies, but the other puts out a bill that is impossible to see as anything but a giveaway to insurance the health industry. If they pass it with the mandate, it's nothing but a forced tax and I don't see anywhere it will reduce the costs. They don't want it to as that would hurt the stock market :(
Greybeard said…
This "Health care reform" bill was NEVER about Health care...
Like the "Climate Change" treaty, it's about government taking control of our lives, and it stinks to high heaven.
The Republic is at risk.
Rain said…
To me the Republicans want to have business take control of our lives. How is that better? The big businesses pay them money to get that power. I didn't see that the health care bill was going to take over any power on our lives if it was single payer and for all; but when it's mandated and no control on what insurance can charge, then I am uneasy. It's an unholy partnership between corporate interests and government and both parties are equally into it no matter what words they say.
Rain said…
We have the worst health care in the 'advanced' world (and even some of the not so 'advanced' and pay the most for it. I don't see that changing with the current compromises to satisfy the right wing and it didn't satisfy them anyway
Greybeard said…
"I didn't see that the health care bill was going to take over any power on our lives if it was single payer and for all;"
And therein lies the problem, Rain.
Greybeard said…
Oh, and Rain...
Your comment about us having the worst health care in the advanced world?
Prove that, please.
Thank you.
Rain said…
I am going by life expectancy and infant mortality plus what we actually pay for it. Try this for the statistics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_the_United_States We have to fear illnesses, can't always get to see a doctor or get the care we need. Too many of us don't have any regular access to a doctor. I read another blog where the woman, a very nice, hardworking, contributing woman, can no longer drive at night safely (even though she sometimes must) because of cataracts. She was recently told by her doctor (and I am assuming this relates to insurance paying) that she cannot have the cataract surgery because she's not totally handicapped by them. That's what many Americans live with.
Rain said…
I still disapprove of the current health care bill because of all the little goodies stuffed into it, the mandate but no cost controls; but it looks like it's going to pass and probably the House will be pressured into going along with it. Insurance companies will make more money, stocks will go up again, a lot of it won't even take effect until 2014 (like no yearly limits, like not overcharging those with existing conditions) when it might all be overturned anyway, and I am not sure what it will end up doing to get people health care when they need it. I don't trust the lobbyists or the legislators. I am disgusted with our whole process; but if you think the Republicans are your saviors in this, you aren't paying attention to what actually happens vs. what is talked :(
Greybeard said…
Well, we agree on one thing Rain...
This "Health care reform" bill stinks.
It doesn't reform health care, and in an already troubled economy, it's another huge step towards disaster.
"Hope and Change"?
Well, it's a change for the better for insurance companies and big pharma and those that want Government controlling more people's lives.
But tell me... where's the "Hope" for the rest of us?
Priority list:
Food, shelter, water, Gold/Silver, and LEAD, (at the tip of a brass casing).
Rain said…
Same place it's always been if you count on a politician to deliver it. Remember when Bush ran the first time on compassionate conservative. He didn't mention his plan to attack Iraq, which those in the White House at that time said he began trying to figure out from his inauguration. I am not sure there are any politicians out there who can deliver anything positive :(
Greybeard said…
You assume, where you shouldn't.
You and I don't agree on the necessity of the Iraq war. My only complaint is the other members of the U.N. that continued to threaten Saddam Hussein, (unsuccessfully), didn't put a stop to the RAPE ROOMS and the CHILDREN'S PRISONS sooner.
Rain. . . It's good to air problems from all sides to arrive at the best possible solution. In the current matter of health care legislation your comments preceded by irrelevant Bush-Bashing lose credibility. I know the matter is very frustrating but let's get past Bush. He has little or nothing to do with this legislation.

You've made several observations that are either badly biased or not true at all. You say that Republicans want big business to take over our lives. It would be more accurate to say that our government (Democrats and Republicans) want to take over our lives. Democrats have a long history of favoring labor unions, Republicans a history of favoring business enterprises. It is both parties that favor big and bigger government - and that interprets to increasing control over our lives.

You have said many times that America has the worst health care in the world. That seems to be a much repeated lie in the blog world. Overall our medical and healthcare system is one of the best anywhere. It services the largest percentage of our population with TIMELY and HIGH QUALITY medical attention. You refer to wikipedia.org for measurement and statistics. Do you realize that wikipedia gets it's information from unproven bloggers. Even the U.N. which doesn't even like us gives more accurate statistics.

Our anger, both yours and mine, should be directed toward the uncontrolled insurance companies that have turned our medical care industry into a cash cow. The romance between politicians and medical insurers has got to be brought under control or eliminated - and replaced with a better, less costly, less unfair, and less domineering influence.

At this point we firmly divide. You want the insurance industry out and the government in. I see this as simply making the problem larger, less efficient, and more unfair. In my book the government has managed no similar major program well - EVER!

The federal government MIGHT be able to regulate some of the loopholes that allow medical insurance companies to make obscene profits. It might also provide supplemental financial aid to those with pre-existing conditions or who can not pay for other reasons.

I am not confident that our present government is capable of inserting itself in the financial part of providing medical care. They have made a mess out of the Post Office, the educational system, the banking industry, the mortgage loan industry, and so on. They could easily make a mess out of providing health care as well. But surely it's worth an attempt BEFORE SIGNING ON TO A MISERABLE, BADLY WRITTEN, INCOMPLETE, PIECE OF HEALTHCARE LEGISLATION THAT FEW HAVE READ AND NO ONE UNDERSTANDS.

Dixon
Rain said…
The post office doesn't work? I guess you must live somewhere I don't as we have excellent service in the rural area where I am. Right now they can ship things faster and better often than UPS. When we need it held for awhile, as recently, they do it efficiently. I am as happy with it as any service. So far I don't know about the Social Security system as it's brand new but it seems to be sending the checks and it very much managed the sign up with making sure I was qualified.

As for the rest of what you said, I was talking about what Bush did as an impact on the money that is now available, the debt we face, the attitude of not paying for what we do. It is not possible to discuss what is happening now in our life or the government if we don't look at what has happened as a factor. You cannot tell me that most people aren't worried about health care because of the failure of the anti poverty programs of the past. You talk about the government not doing anything right as your concern for the health care; so you also look at the past. What bush did is very much a factor in today and it might be in the future if the right wing choose another like him.

If you think it's okay to lie us into a war, I might ask would that be only when it's the right doing it and not the left? Supposing you found out that Obama ignored data, lied about what he did know, and then got us into a war somewhere. Would you care then? I think if it was right to attack Iraq, it was right to be honest about why and PAY for it as we went! I also think they should not have rushed to do it before our people were fully armored.

I am not surprised you see this all as you do because it's part of the right/left divide in this country which is pretty much handicapping us for doing anything. As a people we don't agree on where we should go and so we trade leadership all the time getting us nowhere. I guess that's not possible to change at this point.
Greybeard said…
I would LOVE to have the FREEDOM to mail a letter via UPS or FEDEX.
Why is it I cannot do that?
Because I'm FORCED to use the U.S. Postal service.
Rain, like you I live in a small community and I'm on a first-name basis with my Postmaster. She goes to my Church. If I mail a letter, it gets where it is addressed in a reasonable amount of time. But when I go into the Post Office in "BigTown" I have to deal with surliness and anger.
If the U.S. Postal service didn't have a monopoly on 1st Class mail, they'd be bankrupt in no time at all.

And lying us into war?
Horse plop.
You are in-credible.
Rain said…
Have you seen a lot of horse plop? if you have, you know it has a lot of undigested material and spreads weeds real bad. But it is in tidy piles, relatively easy to clean up; so you might prefer cow plop

As for the truth of the war, Bush/Cheney claimed they had weapons of mass destruction. inspectors said they did not. We claimed they hid them here or there but every location turned out to be bad info (due to torture probably?) and we claimed they had the potential to do a nuclear bomb. They did not and they were not buying yellow cake but we used the least credible sources to say they were. AND if we had wanted to off Hussein, we could have but we wanted to invade. That's the lies.

As for postal service, Farm Boss's business has found the postal service gets there just as fast and at 1/3 the cost. So it might be where you live. He's operating out of Corvallis, Oregon and sending around the nation.

Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual / Incompetent / Liberal

We all know that there are serious problems with ou American political system. The federal government and national media have been telling us that we continue to lead the world in just about everything. Unfortunately, we do not. Measuring our status against other nations is difficult as it entails comparison of different attributes and characteristics. Comparisons are, at best, crude.  Surely, if we look, it's clear that America is no longer dominant among the world's communities. 


For decades following the 1929 economic depression, America has enriched foreign industries at the expense of our own. We have subsidized foreign military powers while allowing the depletion of our own. We've defended other nations borders while, at the same time, not defended our own. We've spent trillions of dollars to subsidize unworthy governments, and let our own infrastructure to fall into disrepair. 

The use of our economic power as a diplomatic tool may have been the correct thing to d…

Cruel and Thoughtless . . .

A disheartening situation has hit our family. A cousin, one that we don't know very well, has reached 93 years of age. Most of the Chapman family made it to the mid 80's, but Mary Lou Chapman has managed a few years more. And, she's not gone yet. Mary was unmarried her entire life. She grew up in a good home, was well educated, has always hd a good job, and has enjoyed pretty good health - until just a few years ago. While she is still very much alive, I sometimes speak in the past tense as if she had already died. Mary is either confused or in her own little world now. She began losing some of her sparkle a few years ago. At first it was mild memory loss, and then mild hearing loss, and then drifting in her speech as she lost track of what she wanted to say. Her Doctor said it was a mild dementia coming on with old age, and nothing to worry about yet. A few month's passed by before she began to have problems driving herself to the market and appointments and so forth,…

Mark Turner - Another Look

MARK TURNER.  I'm an interested ex-corporate exec., now retired, and have little to contribute to this. Perhaps you can help? At first I thought Mark's story was so complicated it couldn't be true. I discovered later that  Mark's business may indeed have  generated as much money as he said it did. His story is long and complicated, but regardless of his guilt or innocence, there is definitely  something wrong with the legal process he encountered. Maggie Thornton says his business dealings were honest. I'm not thoroughly convinced, but she may be right.  There is no question that he was improperly sentenced in one court, and deserves an appeal process in another. 


I have received several comments from a blogger named "Anonymous". He (or she) has chosen to remain unknown but clearly has an inside track to information about Mark's problems. I have removed my original speculations from this blog and regret there were so many errors. Sorry folks, my fault…