Skip to main content

Can Government Be Un-Corrupted



The most recent Bush Administration was not overly popular from the get-go. Both political parties did everything they could to bend the voting results. The public was tired of both candidates prior to the announced election of Bush.  He was thought of as a silver spooned priveledged and spoiled young man that would never have been in position to be elected dog catcher if he didn't have family connections. The Democrats put up Gore because they had no other choice. The guy is such a loopy-whiner it's a wonder he became their candidate, and if the coin toss went his way - he could have been President. Now isn't that an ugly thought.



But that's history now. When 2008 came along the populace was desperate for change. Bush no longer enjoyed their unquestioning trust, and Obama promised good speeches and lots of feel-good changes should he be elected. Despite being new and untested, Obama won by only a shadow - but he took that shadow as a mandate for revolution. His election was anything but that.

As President, Mr. Obama has done precious little that is supported by the majority of Americans. In fact, his efforts have been just the opposite - and not at all similar to his campaign promises. He says something and then does something else . . . better than any politician on the national scene for years. American citizens are irate. Obama now has a very low Presidential approval rating in most polls. If he were to run for office against Bugs Bunny today, he would lose.

The STUPID AND DYSFUNCTIONAL REPUBLICANS are so leaderless they run in circles. Get over it you dimwits, the God-Awful Medical Care legislation is going to pass. Now is the time to move on. Concentrate on issues that will help our lost national purpose. Develop a simple list of principles that most Republicans and Independents can and will support. Listen to the people that elect you.

You might start with exposing and then eliminating the corrupt purchasing of votes to get the damn health care monstrosity passed. Work on getting rid of earmarks, making the legislative process more transparent, pass a law that all legislation must be placed on the internet at least one week before coming to a up or down vote. Require all legislators to accept regular Social Security (and nothing else from the government) on retirement.

Lastly, probably the most corrupted and ultimately damaging to Americans in general, is the terribly ineffective national educational system. In the long run fixing this would perhaps be the Republicans most beneficial activity as well as a key element in reinvigorating the party.

end





Comments

Greybeard said…
But... but... but...
BUSH!!!

Agreed, my friend.
We can either choose it ourselves or have the hard lesson forced upon us, as California and Illinois are about to learn...
Fiscal responsibility!

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon