Skip to main content

Priorities Gone Crazy

.
Apparently the global warming scientists have been doctoring the books. There were enough reasons to believe their theory but the evidence just didn't support it. In fact it supported the opposite. Quandry. What to do. They (the scientists)  are certain that increasing human activity is changing our atmosphere and more heat from the sun is getting through to warm the earth. Jeez. Hard to prove.

Greenland is melting but the ice is getting thicker in Anarctica. Does either occurance have anything to do with the overall warming of the planet? Since the answer is still not clear one way or the other, isn't it simply prudent to accept that the human footprint grows with the population, and that we may be able to reduce the effect of global warming by better controlling our harmful activities? 

Okay, I can accept that as long as we put the idea in perspective. Let's not go hog wild with grand and expensive changes to accomplish improvement. Global warming, if there really is such a condition, should NOT be at the top of our priority list. 

If true, it has the potential to harm society SOMEDAY - but not soon. There are many other more urgent concerns.

More important examples list: 
  • Eliminating WAR as a political or religious tool.
  • Increasing medical care availability.
  • Improving the making and distribution of nourishing foods.
  • Replacing fossil fuel energy sources with nuclear power. 

I don't believe the potential man made global warming that might have adverse impact on human beings one or ten centuries from now - is as important as any one of the above.

Anyone agree?

Comments

Rain said…
The problem is global climate change could be important or maybe won't be but we might not know until it's too late. I think they should skip the stupid carbon tax credits which will only make money for some people and instead go for fossil fuel taxes which are easy to instigate (even if unpopular) and use the profits for energy research and applying what we already know. The thing is we know it's not good to be sending so much money to countries that are our enemies. It fouls up our balance of trade; so do what will discourage the use while investigating better ways to get around and heat our homes. If carbon dioxide happens to be important, it will help that. The arguments over the glaciers and ice shelves go way beyond just our oceans rising but even water supplies many places like China where they depend on glacier melt. I have read several recent article on all of this and will try and put the links into my blog whenever I get to the subject. Overall though I agree with you that we have a lot of very big immediate problems to deal with, and a lot of the suggestions for energy don't seem to me to be that effective except for making money for somebody who is in the green systems already. Wonder who that could be...

Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual / Incompetent / Liberal

We all know that there are serious problems with ou American political system. The federal government and national media have been telling us that we continue to lead the world in just about everything. Unfortunately, we do not. Measuring our status against other nations is difficult as it entails comparison of different attributes and characteristics. Comparisons are, at best, crude.  Surely, if we look, it's clear that America is no longer dominant among the world's communities. 


For decades following the 1929 economic depression, America has enriched foreign industries at the expense of our own. We have subsidized foreign military powers while allowing the depletion of our own. We've defended other nations borders while, at the same time, not defended our own. We've spent trillions of dollars to subsidize unworthy governments, and let our own infrastructure to fall into disrepair. 

The use of our economic power as a diplomatic tool may have been the correct thing to d…

Cruel and Thoughtless . . .

A disheartening situation has hit our family. A cousin, one that we don't know very well, has reached 93 years of age. Most of the Chapman family made it to the mid 80's, but Mary Lou Chapman has managed a few years more. And, she's not gone yet. Mary was unmarried her entire life. She grew up in a good home, was well educated, has always hd a good job, and has enjoyed pretty good health - until just a few years ago. While she is still very much alive, I sometimes speak in the past tense as if she had already died. Mary is either confused or in her own little world now. She began losing some of her sparkle a few years ago. At first it was mild memory loss, and then mild hearing loss, and then drifting in her speech as she lost track of what she wanted to say. Her Doctor said it was a mild dementia coming on with old age, and nothing to worry about yet. A few month's passed by before she began to have problems driving herself to the market and appointments and so forth,…

Mark Turner - Another Look

MARK TURNER.  I'm an interested ex-corporate exec., now retired, and have little to contribute to this. Perhaps you can help? At first I thought Mark's story was so complicated it couldn't be true. I discovered later that  Mark's business may indeed have  generated as much money as he said it did. His story is long and complicated, but regardless of his guilt or innocence, there is definitely  something wrong with the legal process he encountered. Maggie Thornton says his business dealings were honest. I'm not thoroughly convinced, but she may be right.  There is no question that he was improperly sentenced in one court, and deserves an appeal process in another. 


I have received several comments from a blogger named "Anonymous". He (or she) has chosen to remain unknown but clearly has an inside track to information about Mark's problems. I have removed my original speculations from this blog and regret there were so many errors. Sorry folks, my fault…