Skip to main content

Wait A Minute War

Like many other Americans, I listened to Mr. Obama explain why he has (finally) made a decision about what to do with Afghanistan. It wasn't much of a speech but it did point out that we don't know much about our enemy. We know so little it is embarassing. Let's get a few things corrected.

America (President Bush) did NOT start the current war in Iraq. Saddam Hussein waved the white flag in 1991 and said he wanted peace. He promised to end Iraq's support of terrorists and to cooperate with weapons inspectors sent to verify the extent of his military capability. For 12 long years he violated his promises. He defied the U.N., flew military aircraft in the (agreed on) no-fly zone, and continued to threaten his neighbors. Saddam Hussein's actions caused the first Gulf war to be re-opened. 

The population of Afghanistan is about 13 million. The Taliban organization has approximately 25 to 30 thousand members. The Taliban controlled Afghanistan until we removed them from power. When they were in control the Taliban harbored and supported the Al-Qaida terrorist organization. At the time they were forced out of Afghanistan, Al Qaida had only 200 or 300 members. The Taliban moved to a mountainous region of Pakistan together with the Al Qaida terrorists, which is where they are located now.

Al Qaida is believed to be responsible for training and supporting the terrorists that attacked the World Trade Center on 9/11. It's leader and provider of finances is Osama bin Laden, and most important, it has an unknown number of terrorist cells that are largely independent but definitely operating under the Al Qaida banner all over the globe. It appears to be a loose confederation using the same methods to indoctrinate and train terrorists. Their key characteristic is their willingness to kill infidels by committing suicide - all in the name of THE PEACEFUL RELIGION OF ISLAM.

America has had miltary forces in Afghanistan for over 8 years and they still don't have a reliable government, a legal system, an adequate source of medical care, and a police or military able to enforce the law and defend the people.  The country is so backward, so deep in poverty, and the people are so different, that 5 more years of American presence will not change their circumstances or their future.

To restore American honor we need to destroy Al Qaida including it's leadership. To prevent the Taliban from returning to Afghanistan and to prevent them from harboring terrorists in the future, America must reduce their power. If we have to destroy the Taliban organization in order to eliminate the Al Qaida terrorists, so be it. By my count that is still only TWO objectives.

As of yesterday we plan to send 30,000 more troops to reinforce the 10,000 we already have in place. Great Britain is promising another 8,000, and assorted other countries are promising another 5,000. By my count we will have over 53,000 military personnel there to fight about 25,000 Taliban-Al Qaida Muslims. Our troops have more powerful weapons by a factor of 10 times. I would call that an OVERWHELMING FORCE and they should be able to WIN. 

Okay . . . but what are we winning? Afghanistan will remain a backward, poppy growing, destitute and cruel country. The Taliban (perhaps be a different name) wil start up again to control the money from the drug trade. Osama bin Laden is only unique because he has access to money. Otherwise, he's just another brain dead terrorist. Al Qaida or some organization like it, will rise again. We have lost a lot of blood and treasure for what?

Wouldn't it make more sense to simply pull out. Leave Afghanistan to sort their own problems. Provide some humanitarian aid for a while. Put a large dollar prize on the head of Osama bin Laden and may the assassin retire in riches.


Rain said…
The big question would be why did the Bush administration arrange for Osama to escape from Tora Bora? What possible motive other than an excuse to invade Iraq which otherwise the American people would never agree to do. They lied their way into that war while letting Osama go and the question in all of this is why? We could have killed Hussein if we had wanted but we didn't want that either. We wanted to invade Iraq but why?
Rain . . . Enough with the Bush-Cheney conspiracy stuff. It never happened. (1) Osama escaped because someone was stupid. (2) Iraq threatened to disrupt our oil supply and to attack Israel. Either was sufficient to cause the war. (3) If anyone lied it was the intelligence communitee who agreed Iraq's WMD existed. (4) Once Saddam was toppled, his government disbursed, and his military rendered powerless, we should have pulled out. (5) The really stupid "war" is being transferred to Afghanistan and Pakistan by your favorite politician.

Rain said…
First of all, tora bora did happen. They believed he was there and they let the warlords catch him or so they claimed. Read up on it yourself. Only an extreme right wing blogger would deny it happened. It's not conspiracy talk that it happened. The conspiracy comes into why it happened and my opinion is they didn't want Osama captured just yet.

As for Iraq, we had gone quite a few years without attacking them. Bush the first weakened them to a point they were no risk to us (and how we got into the first situation is even more questionable with us telling Saddam it'd be okay to attack Kuwait. Maybe an irresponsible underling but still strange. To go to war with Iraq Bush lied or was lied to. If you like lies as a reason for going to war tell me how you'd feel if it was Obama doing the lying. IF there was a good reason to invade Iraq and stay there (where we still are) why did they have to lie to do it. No WMDs and no nukes. They said he hid them and told the American people where except there were none there and it was all wrong (at the least) which they admit also

Obama is following in the footsteps of right wingers on Afghanistan and I don't like it either. I think, like Bush, he's trusting the wrong people.

Pakistan is more of a problem given they have nukes (no need to lie about that one) and are at risk with an unstable government; but what can we really do about it?

I have no favorite politicians. I voted for Obama but given the options, I still think it was the right vote!
Hi Rain . . . Yeah. Tora Bora happened. They seem to think bin Laden simply walked toward Pakistan and disappeared. Our military had been working with some locals to find the guy. They changed sides. Probably some money was involved. Our military blundered big time by not blocking the exits from Tora Bora. They try to blame the Pakistani troops that were supposed to do so. It doesn't wash. Our on the ground military obviously bungled. I don't know why you believe Bush and Cheney arranged the bin Laden escape so there must be a conspiracy. That's a lot of baloney. The only administration person who commented before it happened was, of all people, Don Rumsfeld, who told a newsperson; "It's a long border and a very complicated area to try to seal, and there's just simply no way you can put a perfect cork in the bottle".


Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual / Incompetent / Liberal

We all know that there are serious problems with ou American political system. The federal government and national media have been telling us that we continue to lead the world in just about everything. Unfortunately, we do not. Measuring our status against other nations is difficult as it entails comparison of different attributes and characteristics. Comparisons are, at best, crude.  Surely, if we look, it's clear that America is no longer dominant among the world's communities. 

For decades following the 1929 economic depression, America has enriched foreign industries at the expense of our own. We have subsidized foreign military powers while allowing the depletion of our own. We've defended other nations borders while, at the same time, not defended our own. We've spent trillions of dollars to subsidize unworthy governments, and let our own infrastructure to fall into disrepair. 

The use of our economic power as a diplomatic tool may have been the correct thing to d…

Cruel and Thoughtless . . .

A disheartening situation has hit our family. A cousin, one that we don't know very well, has reached 93 years of age. Most of the Chapman family made it to the mid 80's, but Mary Lou Chapman has managed a few years more. And, she's not gone yet. Mary was unmarried her entire life. She grew up in a good home, was well educated, has always hd a good job, and has enjoyed pretty good health - until just a few years ago. While she is still very much alive, I sometimes speak in the past tense as if she had already died. Mary is either confused or in her own little world now. She began losing some of her sparkle a few years ago. At first it was mild memory loss, and then mild hearing loss, and then drifting in her speech as she lost track of what she wanted to say. Her Doctor said it was a mild dementia coming on with old age, and nothing to worry about yet. A few month's passed by before she began to have problems driving herself to the market and appointments and so forth,…

The Reluctant Liberal

I've a grandson that has been exposed to political liberalism all his life. In it's modern version the words "left wing" means the liberal side of politics, and "right wing" describes the more conservative side. In our two party system each term may be used to describe a member of either party. Believe it or not, there are a few conservative Democrats.
Today, the Democratic Party has become  overwhelmingly "liberal" and the Republican Party more conservative.  At times it has been difficult to find enough reasonable cooperation between parties and that is, unfortunately, how it is today. With President Trump now in the saddle, the Democratic Party has refused any level of cooperation -  and our government has slowed to a walk.

The simple explanation is probably the correct one. The hard left wing, usually members of the Democratic Party, allows no other point of view. They each consider moderate and conservative opposing ideas to have no merit. This…