Skip to main content

War Is A Nasty Business We Shouldn't Be In.

.
The benefits of WAR have changed so much that it's no longer effective. Shouldn't we accept the hard fact that in a war everyone loses? The United States has something like 8,000 atomic bombs in the cupboard, and Mother Russia probably has about the same in theirs. Certainly, between the two governments, there are enough to eliminate humanity. When is enough, enough?

Forget for a moment, whether or not the war in Iraq was JUSTIFIED, and whether or not the subsequent war against Isalmic terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan is NECESSARY to protect America. Just drop it. Think instead of the fact that there are enough powerful weapons present in the world to erase all of the people within these areas. Do we, or anyone else, really want to do that? Of couse not. It is insane.

So what are we doing? We are fighting a limited and antiseptic (kill no civilians) war on the enemies turf - and - restricting the amount of power our side can bring to bear in the conflict. Instead of using our sophisticated and overly powerful weapons that could WIN (?) in all of the disputed areas WITHIN HOURS, we fight on for YEARS with our military having both hands tied behind their backs. This is absurd.

The killing of civilians is no longer acceptable and therefore UNLIMITED war can no longer be waged. It is not POLITICALLY CORRECT any more, but do we have to submit to an enemy in order to maintain our political correctness? Come on folks, there must be another answer.  WE HAVE BEEN ATTACKED and remain under attack. Our nation is being depleted one soldier at a time, by a poorly connected rabble of fundamentalist Muslims. Their number is unknown but it is certainly a comparative few. This enemy has no address and very limited military power. They are unable to manufacture competitive weapons and armaments. But whether we like it or not, they are gathering more and more to their cause. They are winning the UNDERDOG SYMPATHY VOTE worldwide. 

There is no mystery here. The enemy attracts manpower because of the vast differences between RICH and POOR. Yes, it is that simple. That is precisely where the real problem lies. It has been slapped in the faces of undeveloped and poor nations by the huge expansion of media availability, particularly over the last 50 years or so. The advancement of television  bears much of the responsibility. Poor and wretched people are able to see exactly how their lives compare to lives of the rich around the world. It is no wonder they are discontented and miserable and ready to join the terrorists. They have very little to lose.

More later. . .

THE ENEMY IS ISLAM. There, I've said it. It's not politically correct, but it is true. Why can't we face it and say so? The religion of Islam as outlined in the Qu'ran and interpreted by thousands of clerics, each of whom is apparently free to cherry pick the text to suit his own purposes, is mis-used to justify aggressive, militant behavior. The book, like the Christian Holy Bible, contains many contradictions. Both the Qu'ran and the Bible are believed to be the word of God. In the case of the Qu'ran, it is the word of God as interpreted by Mohammed, and the Bible is the commonly believed to be the word of God as interpreted by all sorts of people. Most Christians believe that God inspired and guided the scribes that actually wrote the Bible. I have never heard it said that God inspired and guided Mohammed. An interesting point, but perhaps not important.

The Christian religion is divided by many denominations, each with it's own hierarchy with a leader at the top. The Islamic religion is divided by various sects whose leaders appear to have rather vague connections. Interestingly, the Muslim enemies that are at war with us seem to originate from several of the sects within Islam, yet they themselves do not have a firm leadership structure. Relatively small and independent terrorist groups are simply out to KILL ALL NON-BELEIVERS (Infidels). They all seem  to lack any feelings of guilt or shame, and they all believe that by killing themselves and infidels at the same time, they will hasten their promised journey to Paradise. The promise is illogical theological gibberish - yet many "westernized"  and educated Muslims believe it absolutely.

How do we deal with such an dysfunctional and brutal enemy.

More later. . .

Comments

Rain said…
You said it well. We should only fight wars we can fight all out. This is crazy as it is.

I don't think this is about the poverty so much as the ideology. Saudi Arabia could give their people more but they have kept it for the wealthy few. It hasn't led to them being attacked. I think the terrorist sympthasizers have sold us as being corrupt, decadent and deserving of death.

I saw a lady on one of the interview shows discussing the problem of getting the responsible Muslim people to decide enough is enough and begin to turn against those who do violent acts. She was from the Middle East and has bravely chosen to speak out even when it puts her at risk. Until more of them do that, I am not sure how we turn around their mindset.

For now we have to protect ourselves from it by preventing attacks as best we can, by extra checks on those who have the characteristics of being a possible extremists (and forget the PC concerns. There is a fifth column in this country working to stop us from using reasonable measures to protect ourselves) and going after those who do them with an iron hand (like we do when some commit crimes in this country). I read that the machines that could have detected these explosive elements have not been repaired and we have less up today than we could if we paid that repair cost each year. It's irresponsible to not do what we can.

Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual / Incompetent / Liberal

We all know that there are serious problems with ou American political system. The federal government and national media have been telling us that we continue to lead the world in just about everything. Unfortunately, we do not. Measuring our status against other nations is difficult as it entails comparison of different attributes and characteristics. Comparisons are, at best, crude.  Surely, if we look, it's clear that America is no longer dominant among the world's communities. 


For decades following the 1929 economic depression, America has enriched foreign industries at the expense of our own. We have subsidized foreign military powers while allowing the depletion of our own. We've defended other nations borders while, at the same time, not defended our own. We've spent trillions of dollars to subsidize unworthy governments, and let our own infrastructure to fall into disrepair. 

The use of our economic power as a diplomatic tool may have been the correct thing to d…

Cruel and Thoughtless . . .

A disheartening situation has hit our family. A cousin, one that we don't know very well, has reached 93 years of age. Most of the Chapman family made it to the mid 80's, but Mary Lou Chapman has managed a few years more. And, she's not gone yet. Mary was unmarried her entire life. She grew up in a good home, was well educated, has always hd a good job, and has enjoyed pretty good health - until just a few years ago. While she is still very much alive, I sometimes speak in the past tense as if she had already died. Mary is either confused or in her own little world now. She began losing some of her sparkle a few years ago. At first it was mild memory loss, and then mild hearing loss, and then drifting in her speech as she lost track of what she wanted to say. Her Doctor said it was a mild dementia coming on with old age, and nothing to worry about yet. A few month's passed by before she began to have problems driving herself to the market and appointments and so forth,…

Mark Turner - Another Look

MARK TURNER.  I'm an interested ex-corporate exec., now retired, and have little to contribute to this. Perhaps you can help? At first I thought Mark's story was so complicated it couldn't be true. I discovered later that  Mark's business may indeed have  generated as much money as he said it did. His story is long and complicated, but regardless of his guilt or innocence, there is definitely  something wrong with the legal process he encountered. Maggie Thornton says his business dealings were honest. I'm not thoroughly convinced, but she may be right.  There is no question that he was improperly sentenced in one court, and deserves an appeal process in another. 


I have received several comments from a blogger named "Anonymous". He (or she) has chosen to remain unknown but clearly has an inside track to information about Mark's problems. I have removed my original speculations from this blog and regret there were so many errors. Sorry folks, my fault…