Skip to main content

Airline Security and Haiti

.

AIRLINE SECURITY AND HAITI. Strange bedfellows to be sure, but hold that thought. Since 9/11 our defensive response to tighten airline security, despite throwing millions of dollars at it, has remained a bit of a joke. Our knee-jerk reaction is understandable, but we can do much better if we just think about the problem.

Let's start with HOMELAND SECURITY. I suppose a shaky case can be made that we needed it for psychological reinforcement, but I think not. It's creation was just another stupid political blunder.
      
      (1) WE HAVE THE F.B.I. management, structure, and power
            in place to protect Americans within the national borders.
      
      (2) WE HAVE THE C.I.A. management, structure, and power
            in place to protect American interests out side of our
            national borders.

I dont think there was ANY GOOD REASON to create another bureaucratic agency.


HUGE U.S.S.R. AIRCRAFT 2010

WHO ARE WE AT WAR WITH? Terrorists? Oil interests? The answer is neither one. Our government, for some unknown reason, hesitates to name our enemy? This is crazy. History tells us that there will always be a lunatic fringe of anti-anything terrorists. Their number is usually small and they can be handled as a police matter. That case is closed. The ISLAMOFASCIST case isn't.

But first:  HOW ABOUT OIL?  The oil issue is entirely bogus and always has been. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) people have known that over 4 BILLION BARRELS of oil is readily available to us from under North Dakota and Montana.  That's 25 times the 1995 estimate. They call this discovery THE BAKKEN FORMATION and it contains enough oil to replace ALL current American sources. At the present time the government prohibits development. Interesting isn't it.  Okay then, if it's not oil what is the answer.

WE ARE AT WAR WITH ARAB FUNDAMENTALIST ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.  This war has been ongoing on in other parts of the world since before the nation of Israel was established.  Only recently has it directly attacked targets on American soil.

FUNDAMENTALIST INTERPRETATIONS OF THE MAJOR RELIGIONS CAN BE DANGEROUS. The Holy Bible contains episodes of horrible violence, brutal murders, and innocent death, yet rational Christians and Jews do not use these examples to justify similar violence in the world today. The Qu'ran contains similarly awful episodes and IS USED BY RADICAL FUNDAMENTALIST MUSLIMS to justify similar behavior today. That's a pretty significant difference.

RADICAL FUNDAMENTALIST MUSLIMS are a small part of the Islamic religion. Despite being a minority within the many divisions and sects of Islam, the RADICAL FUNDAMENTALISTS now control the entire religion. The much larger number of peaceful, moderate, and rational Muslims have become thoroughly intimidated, and there is no  organized Islamic resistance.  Therefore, ALL MUSLIMS MUST BE CONSIDERED OUR ENEMIES UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE.

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS MUST BE IGNORED.  We can generally identify our possible and potential enemies by racial and religious profiling, and we must do it. This business of concentrating billions of dollars and employing thousands of government employees charged to pat down / wand / x-ray / and question 80 year old American Grandmothers and babies at the airport . . . is inconviencing ALL AIR TRAVELERS.  Great long lines of angry passengers wait to be checked through a security system that may or may not catch a dysfunctional Arab with a bomb in his shoe. We are destroying our airline industry in order to catch a very small number of real enemies. Look at the numbers:

(1) Recently there has been 1 AIRLINE TERRORIST incident over 16 MILLION FLIGHTS.

(2) There has been 1 AIRLINE TERRORIST incident in over 12 MILLION MILES FLOWN.

(3) In the 8 YEARS before 12/30/09 there were 3 attempts by AIRLINE TERRORISTS.

(4) In one year there is 1 CHANCE IN 500,000 of being hit with LIGHTNING.

(5) How much are we spending on preventing LIGHTNING STRIKES?

More numbers:


(a) Excepting 3000 killed on 9/11, between the years 2000 and 2010
     only 469 people were killed by AIRLINE TERRORISTS.


(b) AND FINALLY it appears that as many as 40,000 people have
     been killed in HAITI during last weeks earthquake.

It's not a fair comparison, but it furnishes a little perspective.

Dixon

Comments

Rain Trueax said…
The email regarding the Bakken oil reserves is explored on Snopes but knowing you likely don't believe in them, I dug a little deeper. I was suspect regarding the amount that can be gotten from shale without totally destroying the land (something other states might not mind but should) and found this article which seems to indicate that the email you are probably relying on should be investigated farther before thinking it solves the whole problem-- http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3868 There are solutions to our oil usage and some have been improved to the point that they may become a better solution than continuing to depend on oil from anywhere. It's too bad we haven't had the kind of effort put into this that was put into getting someone on the moon.
Bump's Stump said…
Raim and everyone else . . . I apologize big time. Someone sent me a copy of the USGS on Bakken and I believed it to be an accurate picture. After reading the link http://www.theoildrum.com/node/3868 I realize that I did not have the complete story. Both the USGS and The Oil Drum reports contain quite a lot of speculation and estimated yields, etc. Sorry folks.

At the same time Rain, I am reasonably convinced that between off shore drilling and new methods of extraction from shale deposits and untapped Alaskan reserves, that America COULD be free of dependence on middle eastern oil. As for the environmental impact there are several new technologies available (slant drilling, etc.) that should reduce the impact quite a lot. I'll look further into this.

Stay dry.

Dixon
Rain Trueax said…
Yes, I agree. We could do a lot about oil dependence with many methods. I agreed with a lot of what you said here. I don't know how we fight a war against Islamfascism because it's an ideology and not a specific geographic region but our airport security has ignored profiling which it should have been doing and might help although someone who turns terrorist doesn't necessarily have to have a record to show it. We aren't doing what we should though.
Dixon Webb said…
Rain . . . I really try to not pass along bad info, and I often use Shopes and Wikipedia to check facts. Neither is perfect, but both are pretty darn good. I don't know where you got the idea that I dislike either? Anyway, my wife and I are planning to go to Hawaii soon. I think we'll go by bus.

Dixon
Rain Trueax said…
I just thought that because so many on the right don't like snopes or wikipedia. I consider them good but like to get a second view when I can... and we are facing a possible flight back to Tucson but driving isn't so great either. All of my family will be in the air around Spring break. I am not thrilled at that.

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon