Skip to main content

Oil, Disaster, Blame and Obama Politics

I've been watching the unbelievable spout of oil issuing from the British Petroleum deep water wellhead, and I've listened to our unbelievably incompetent government officials as they attempt to deal with it. Their handling of Katrina was bad enough, but this is disgraceful to say the least.

British Petroleum. Their executives agree they area responsible for a major part of the disaster and agreed to put a cork in it and then pay for the damage. Meanwhile, they have undertaken the tremendous effort necessary to address the disaster.  BP has, at least so far, acted in good faith. Yet all efforts to stop the gusher have failed.

Clearly, no one at British Petroleum (or any other major oil company) knows how to shut down the well and recover the bulk of the oil discharge already polluting the ocean.

This deep water spill is, apparently, a new experience and BP was not prepared for it. The 5,200 foot depth of sea bed is extraordinary. No oil company that has operated at this depth has ever had this kind of a blow-out disaster. 

SINCE THE WELL HEAD CUT OFF SAFETY EQUIPMENT HAD NOT BEEN TESTED AT THIS DEPTH . . . WHY WAS BP ALLOWED TO DRILL WITHOUT A PROVEN BACKUP SYSTEM?

Since BP was authorized by our FEDERAL GOVERNMENT REGULATORY AGENCY  it follows that our government also deserves a major share of the blame.


INCOMPETENCE (?) AT THE TOP 

Yesterday our President and advisers soundly and thoroughly criticized British Petroleum executives and forced them to set aside $20,000,000,000 to be used to settle potential claims. NO PRESIDENT HAS EVER HAD THIS POWER.  The Obama Administration INVENTED IT?
Today, our Congressional Oversight Committee "put their foot on the BP throat"  in a obvious political move to determine THE BLAME. WHO CARES? 

The broken well is still gushing. Our GOVERNMENT is using the tragedy to posture as a competent manager of the disaster. Our seriously demented President still sees the tragedy as an opportunity to advance his radical far left agenda.  We must insist that these people get their act together.
The FIRST priority is to stop the gusher.

The SECOND priority os to care for all of the affected people in the region, help them protect their homes, jobs, factories and lifestyles.

The THIRD priority is to clean up and repair the damage.

The priority for determining the BLAME is down the list somewhere. 

Any comments?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide
20 comments
Read more

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention
18 comments
Read more

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon
10 comments
Read more