Skip to main content

Dominating An Inhuman Enemy


            The Commander Idiot         

Torture will not leave my mind.  Perhaps it is because I've been reading so much about Viet Nam recently. It's caused me to think about the relationship between torture and airpower. Yes, the two are related. 

Since World War II we have dominated the air with our unbelievably sophisticated and powerful weapons. It was during the Korean War, however, that we learned airpower alone is much less successful when dealing with a mountainous terrain, and an agrarian society.   

When we eased into Viet Nam by way of advisors that multiplied into a major military force, we frustrated Americans began to increase the application of air power. At first it was to support our ground troops and we used propeller driven planes to strafe, bomb, and locate the enemy. The power of that initial effort graduated to F-86 and F-100 fighters, coupled with hundreds, if not thousands of helicopters, particularly Huey Helicopters, flown as gun ships and for airborne search and rescue missions. We were still losing the war. This did not satisfy several civilian political whiz-kids like Robert MacNamarra. He and a few others led the President to authorize the use of B-52 bombers.

Until they arrived it was theoretically believable that our air power was shooting at enemy troops, equipment, and installations. When the B-52's were introduced this fiction could no longer be supported. America had crossed the line by purposely targeting innocent civilians; men, women and children. Our war policy became one of gross destruction at any cost. We began a program of indiscriminate carpet bombing. It was a scorched earth policy, and it failed utterly. We used bomb strings,  defoliants, and napalm to clear great swaths of the landscape . . . and any living things that happened to be there at the time, was ethically and morally the wrong thing to do. 

Around the world the reaction was one of horror and disgust. It was political suicide for Lyndon Johnson's administration as support for the war went away. The politics of the war soured and our government and military forces pulled out of Viet Nam. In a way similar to the Korean War . . we did not win in Viet Nam.  

Now, years later, Americans no longer approve of carpet bombing innocents. We still have plenty of napalm available, but it may never be used again. Every effort is now made to guide our airborne weapons surgically to precise military targets.  And TORTURE has been eliminated as a means of gathering military information about the enemy. It seems as if we are restricting our defensive and offensive abilities in order to wage a clean and bloodless conflict, an impossible dream. History has proven that it can't be done.

So where is the middle ground?

How do we dictate more humane way of war. . . to a enemy that could care less?
Think Tanks / Politicians / Preachers / Educators / Philosophers . . . or ?

To be continued . . .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual / Incompetent / Liberal

We all know that there are serious problems with ou American political system. The federal government and national media have been telling us that we continue to lead the world in just about everything. Unfortunately, we do not. Measuring our status against other nations is difficult as it entails comparison of different attributes and characteristics. Comparisons are, at best, crude.  Surely, if we look, it's clear that America is no longer dominant among the world's communities. 


For decades following the 1929 economic depression, America has enriched foreign industries at the expense of our own. We have subsidized foreign military powers while allowing the depletion of our own. We've defended other nations borders while, at the same time, not defended our own. We've spent trillions of dollars to subsidize unworthy governments, and let our own infrastructure to fall into disrepair. 

The use of our economic power as a diplomatic tool may have been the correct thing to d…

Cruel and Thoughtless . . .

A disheartening situation has hit our family. A cousin, one that we don't know very well, has reached 93 years of age. Most of the Chapman family made it to the mid 80's, but Mary Lou Chapman has managed a few years more. And, she's not gone yet. Mary was unmarried her entire life. She grew up in a good home, was well educated, has always hd a good job, and has enjoyed pretty good health - until just a few years ago. While she is still very much alive, I sometimes speak in the past tense as if she had already died. Mary is either confused or in her own little world now. She began losing some of her sparkle a few years ago. At first it was mild memory loss, and then mild hearing loss, and then drifting in her speech as she lost track of what she wanted to say. Her Doctor said it was a mild dementia coming on with old age, and nothing to worry about yet. A few month's passed by before she began to have problems driving herself to the market and appointments and so forth,…

Mark Turner - Another Look

MARK TURNER.  I'm an interested ex-corporate exec., now retired, and have little to contribute to this. Perhaps you can help? At first I thought Mark's story was so complicated it couldn't be true. I discovered later that  Mark's business may indeed have  generated as much money as he said it did. His story is long and complicated, but regardless of his guilt or innocence, there is definitely  something wrong with the legal process he encountered. Maggie Thornton says his business dealings were honest. I'm not thoroughly convinced, but she may be right.  There is no question that he was improperly sentenced in one court, and deserves an appeal process in another. 


I have received several comments from a blogger named "Anonymous". He (or she) has chosen to remain unknown but clearly has an inside track to information about Mark's problems. I have removed my original speculations from this blog and regret there were so many errors. Sorry folks, my fault…