Skip to main content

The Pope Goes Backwards . . . Again ?


Most of my friends know I am a rather skeptical Christian with many unresolved questions. Regardless, a few years ago I became a fan of Pope John Paul and I've read many of his books.  No, I didn't always agree,  but I did respect his thoughts regarding the Catholic Church's position on most issues. I believe Pope John Paul was a terrific person, an outstanding intellectual, and a powerful advocate of Catholic religious thought.

Pope Benedict followed, and has a completely different personality. They say he is a bright light in Catholicism, but frankly, I think he pales in comparison with Pope John Paul. The new Pope shoots himself in the foot periodicaly, and I do not think it benefits the troubled Catholic Church.

Here is a typical example. In 2001 and 2005 the Church issued watered down policy statements attempting to put a bandaid on the sexual abuse problem. Now, years later,  Pope Benedict is again in the process of defining penalties for PRIESTS who sexually abuse children. This time he has defined "children" and included mentally disabled adults. He has also extended the statute of limitations from 10 years after a victim turns 18 years old . . .to 20 years after. His new policies are not complete nor are they of any help to the seriously challenged Church.

POPE BENEDICT HAS MANAGED TO OUTRAGE CATHOLICS WORLDWIDE  BY PURPOSELY NOT INCLUDING BISHOPS, CARDINALS AND OTHER EXECUTIVES OF THE CHURCH IN HIS SEX ABUSE POLICY - AND - BY EQUATING SEXUAL ABUSE WITH THE ORDINATION OF WOMEN.  

This has caused a turmoil in the church like none before.

Pope Benedict must be terribly out of touch with his flock.

He's shot himself in the foot again . . . while the church suffers. 

END

Comments

Rain Trueax said…
I am pretty down on religion, it's not believing in something spiritually or living with that belief but what happens when it becomes 'religion.' From what I have heard, and it is disillusioning, Pope John Paul was responsible for hiding some of this abuse, for letting an abusive priest retire without any consequences even when he knew he had been abusive to boys.

It is not just the Catholic Church where this happens. Out where I live, a minister was sexually harassing many of the women. Instead of making him pay a consequence, they just moved him to a different church without any warning to that church. It's that need to hide such things for fear it makes the religion look bad, I think :(
Dixon Webb said…
Rain . .

I'm afraid you're right. Pope John Paul certainly was aware of the sexual abuse problem within the Church and may have acted (or condoned) the effort to cover the horrible results. His action (or lack of action) in this matter is a dark area on his otherwise impressive credentials.

There are still active Priests and other members of the Church who are proven abusers who were simply moved when it became known. The Cardinal of the Los Angeles Diocese is believed to have been responsible for many such cover-ups, and there are several other Bishops and Cardinals who are known to have been involved.

These guys may not be able to look in the mirror but they are free as a bird. They haven't even had their knuckles rapped.

It's a disgrace.

Bump

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Peter Arnett Visits The Geezers

PETER ARNETT 7-22-2010 Yesterday our guest at the  Geezer's Book Club meeting was the intrepid journalist, Peter Arnett.  Ray Herndon, one of our regular members, has known Peter Arnett for over  40 years. They were friendly competitive reporters during the war in Viet Nam, and the friendship has survived several wars since.  Peter began speaking with an overview of his time in  Viet Nam, and then briefly related a few highlights of the first 1st and 2nd war in Iraq.  After taking a deep breath, Peter focused on the intended subject of the day, China and the Chinese people.   CHINA Peter is now teaching journalism at a college about 400 miles north of Hong Kong, near the Chinese coast. Peter is 76 years old, in good health, full of energy and enjoys his job as an educator. In that capacity he is able to travel unhindered (not everyone can) throughout China. He has personally observed the daily trials, troubles and opportunities that abound in this huge and complicated countr