Skip to main content

Political Cooperation ?

America has management problems.

Conservatism offers a small part of the solution and so does Liberalism - but working together appears to be increasingly difficult. Cooperation is almost dead! The two political philosophies are beating each other to ineffectiveness as our Federal and state governments  grind toward monumental failure.

The Framers constructed a political model that was less than perfect but regardless it served America rather well. They knew there were flaws and they expected patriotism and common sense would iron them out. They were wrong.  Corruption, for example, invaded the system   and now, 250 years later, the original political model has become unworkable. Our current economic condition is a reflection of the inability to manage government better than we do.    

In 1929 there was a similar instance. It was the time of the Great Depression and citizens looked to government to correct the problem. The nation's economy had failed and the government found itself grasping at straws for their political life.   Herbert Hoover and the Republicans were widely blamed. The newly elected Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the Democrats were expected to turn the failing economy around. Americans demanded change.  

And change they got. F.D.R. and the Democrats swiftly established government regulation in the more important parts sectors of the economy. They founded government owned industries to quickly employ workers in large numbers. The unemployment lines shortened. The W.P.A. (Work Project Administration), the C.C.C. (Civilian Conservation Corps) are just two examples. The Democrats also  began to imprint additional government authority on the rest of the nation's businesses.

This process of change strained the economy and reduced the freedom of our citizens.

Americans found work. The national debt increased substantially. But before F.D.R. and the Democrats really had a chance to evaluate their efforts - World War II became the  more important crisis and changed everything again.  WWII started with Germany's aggression on our allies in Europe. At first America tooled up and converted key industries in order to produce the weapons and other needs of war. We used our natural resources and manufacturing power to assist our allies in Europe. We supplied their war effort - but before long America was also drawn into the war. Then Japan, taking advantage of our commitment to the European war, also declared war upon America.  We were forced to fight on both sides of the globe.

The good guys won the war. The cost was huge.  

The war caused Americans to draw together and cooperate in the common cause. The war also led to rapid growth and forced rebuilding of the Nation's economy. We had to completely restructure the way we did business. The war was on the one hand the cause of catastrophic and inhuman death, and at the same time responsible for the saving and rebuilding of our economy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon