Skip to main content

Hunger vs Global Warming


GLOBAL WARMING. Several scientists tell us that the earth is warming at an alarming rate. They say that the ice is melting and raising ocean levels faster than we can protect ourselves. There is proof that the polar ice caps are melting and raising ocean levels - but there is a significant controversy over WHY.

We know that many areas on our planet are getting warmer. NASA data suggests a rise of 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1880. They say that it has risen the most and quickest in the Arctic. Interestingly, the same experts acknowledge that many areas around the world are getting colder at the same time? To me, these contradictions raise questions about HOW scientists measure the temperature of the globe. Also, exactly WHO is doing this research? WHO is placing the thermometers, and precisely WHERE are they measuring the temperature? Is the concept that the ENTIRE planet is warming a valid scientific fact?

Planet earth is very old. No one knows how old. For this discussion let us assume the earth is an arbitrary 1 Billion years old. At some time scientists believe that dry lands shifted and separated; that North and South America, for example, separated from Europe and Africa and the Atlantic Ocean filled in between them. Geologists are also certain that large parts of the American west were once under (Ocean) water, and large areas were covered with a thick blanket (glaciers) of ice. There is evidence that at some time planet  earth  'wobbled' on its polar axis, also that there have been changes of the earth’s orbit around the sun.  These conditions have increased and decreased the planet’s temperature. There seems to be no reason to think these changes are not continuing as  write this. Instead, we assume that they occur over very long periods of time. So slow are they that it is difficult to measure them. In comparison human existence has been but an instant since the earth was created - (or began existing if you prefer).
More recently human beings have improved their ability to see into space. Advancing technologies have made possible a fast growing knowledge of the universe. The events that occur on the surface of the sun and how they impact the earth are being studied every day. The sun surface  appears to be some sort of burning gasses subject to huge explosions. The explosions (sun spots) look like flames rising from the sun’s surface- but that appearance is misleading. Astronomers today tell us that solar flares, are essentially very powerful MAGNETIC FIELDS OF POWER.  Scientist suspect that  the sun itself is slowly changing its character.

Could it be that the sun is getting warmer?

1.   Human beings may or may not be the cause of global warming.

2.   If the entire globe is warming it probably an extremely slow process.

3.   Specific areas  are experiencing fast rising temperatures right now.

HUMAN BEINGS BY THE MILLIONS ARE DYING OF STARVATION AND THE LACK OF FRESH WATER - RIGHT NOW!

Perhaps Global Warming should have a lesser priority?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon