Skip to main content

Religion. Any Religion. All Religions.



All  religions ask a  person to look beyond logic and common sense.

Christianity is the religion  I am most familiar with. The next is Judaism, and the last is Islam. These are the  big three in my world. There are many others of course, but I know much less about them - so I want to confine this  discussion to Christianity and start with the "soul".  

Christianity asks a believer to accept that all  human beings have a "soul", an  imperishable part that lives beyond death and will never, ever,  die.   This is, for me,  hard to grasp. And it is just one example. There are many others.  Think, for a moment, of the virgin birth of Jesus? And  the  triad of God the Father, Jesus the Son, and the Holy Ghost - all one?   And how about the notion that the Holy Bible is a collection  of the actual words of God? We know better. 

All of these foundational thoughts defy logic, but are regardless among the principle roots of Christianity.

The lives of the early believers are pretty well known. There are records describing  brutal conditions during and after the time of Christ. There were bloody conflicts,  slavery,  religious wars, and human sacrifices.  How do they square with Christian fidelity, worship, and teachings? Today we associate Christianity's terrible past with "ancient  history" - and claim to be better than that. Non-sense.

That's exactly what I've been thinking about recently. Christians are still passing beggars in the street, still killing each other for no reason whatever, and going about the world with a sense of superiority. As recently as the war in Viet Nam,  American Christians approved the carpet bombing of innocent women, children, and the elderly. Our  political leaders, mostly Christian, appear to follow the same   historical  plans as they  march to war. They repeat the following steps: 
  • 1. They convince their followers that the proposed enemy is a potential threat.
  • 2. That  everyone of the  enemy lacks humanity and  has no  conscience.
  • 3. That the enemy are demons (or devils)  that must be erased for our own safety.
  • 4. And that our enemies, both INNOCENT and GUILT, are acceptable targets for death.
Not one of the four steps is compatible with Christianity.

Every one of them is perfectly in tune with Islam.



Comments

Jack said…
Thirst missions is an incredible organization. I love the ministries that Thirst Missions offers. What a great trip.

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon