Skip to main content

Space. Just Space.

Technology can be more than impressive. It can be amazing. Many years ago I worked with engineers  and other technical people at North American Aviation, Rockwell, Rocketdyne, TRW, Hughes Aircraft, Lockheed, Litton Industries, and most of the other "space exploration pioneers" located in Southern California. As a salesman for Riggs/LaMoree Corp. it was my job to introduce and sell state-of-the-art construction materials suitable for the extreme environments in space. My company represented: 
  • Dow Corning Silicones. (High Temperature Ablatives, Sealants, and Encapsulation products) 
  • DuPont. (Mylar Polyester films, Kapton High Temperature Resistant Films, and Nomex Polyamide products.) 
  • Bentley Harris Corp. (Woven Fiberglas Products coated with materials resistant to severe environments) 
  • Chase Foster Div. of Keene Inc. (Flexible laminates of high temperature and chemical resistant products)
C. D. LaMoree Company was started in 1926 and originally sold electrical insulation products (asbestos, cotton sleeving, dielectric varnish, mica products, fiberglas cordage, and etc). I joined the company in 1960. In the mid-1970's the company was sold and became Riggs/LaMoree Corp. A couple of years went by and I was promoted to V.P. and General Manager. It was during this time, from 1972  to  1982 that there was a gradual change in the materials sold. The original electrical insulation products were phased out and replaced by the more sophisticated high technology products that were used in the early days of space exploration.

Today, when I view the various satellites, space shuttles, and machinery that is advancing our knowledge of space . . . I think of it as another frontier. Perhaps the last frontier? Space exploration is just beginning. The technology to explore space is fantastic. A person has to be impressed with the many challenges that have already been made and curious about those to come. Yes, it is very expensive. It is also very important.

And amazing !

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon