Skip to main content

Education vs The CSS People

Turn the coin over. For years we have heard that California schools were failing and it's not altogether true. A more critical look reveals that there is an entire "California Schools Stink" group-bias that has been at work for a long time, decades. The CSS effort is to convince everyone that achievement levels in K-12 schools in California have steadily fallen behind, and for many years I have believed these people - but they were distorting the facts. Why would they do such a thing? In my research I discovered John Mockler, a former Executive Director of the State Board of Education, a well known California educator and administrator who has given a different insight. At last we have discovered an authority that presents the  truth: 

California Public Schools K-12: 

Great Results With Diminishing Resources". 

Great results? Contrast that view with the CSS (California Schools Stink) headlines, and then note their several selfish agendas. These people have actually profited by declaring California schools to be a failure. Most of them are wealthy and angry and have children in private schools. How is this possible? They support the privatization of public schools, and repeat the mantra: 
  • Massive teacher evaluation results in improved teacher performance.  
  • Strong teacher's unions impede achievement. 
They offer no evidence that to support either. The CSS people rant and rave and will not give schools more money until achievement improves, but when achievement improve the schools still go don't get more money. Instead,  the CSS folks find an excuses while they continue to complain (even louder) that the schools are not doing their job. This situation is starting to smell.

Teachers are usually not compared to each other in a school district or to STATE STANDARDS.  When the CSS  says that K-12 education in California is not competitive they are usually  referring to NATIONAL testing.
  • The commonly used National Assessment of Educational Progress" (NAEP) test scores are not aligned to California's grade level academic standards. No wonder the answers were skewed. 
  • For example; in California more than 60% of our 8th grade students take algebra. NAEP does not test algebra in 8th grade math tests. 
  • California tests English learners the first year they are in school; Texas tests English learners after they have been in school for 3 years
Obviously there is a problem  when trying to compare California students with those of other states. When judged by the CALIFORNIA ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (which you rarely hear about), California's public schools K-12 have been on a steady path of academic growth for the most recent 10 years.

Yes, it's true.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Good info. Lucky me I ran across your blog by chance (stumbleupon).
I've saved as a favorite for later!

Feel free to visit my web blog; triactol before and after

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon