Skip to main content

Can We Trade-In Bad Politicians?

We have a long history of fences. Every nation does.  Lines are drawn around our family,  property next,  city, state, and finally the entire nation. The tendency to draw lines apparently goes all the way back to the creation of man.  History indicates that man has always fought over his "lines".  Isn't this an elementary history of most wars ?  Recently, several scientists  invented a weapon that would win all wars, the Atomic bomb. An unwanted side effect is that man now may have  enough power to blow the earth right out of orbit. It was, I suppose, inevitable that the atomic bomb technology would spread. There are now a dozen nations, some quite unstable, that have the atomic technology.  

The good guys, led by the citizens of the United States,  have a right to be worried, very worried because we are not the most stable and reliable nation any more. We regularly elect and appoint politicians whose only interests are less than honorable:
  • They refuse to stop spending money borrowed from future generations. (We are now  almost 20 Trillion dollars in debt.)
  • After their election almost all of them vote to spend more money - BEFORE insisting on eliminating unnecessary costs and expenses. 
  • Then, after getting elected, they spend the majority of their time campaigning to be re-elected. (How many actually study, discuss and are present to vote on the issues; 10%, 25%, 50%? or more)?
  • And why do we allow establishment political leaders to set their own pay, and decide their own perks, and vote themselves grandly excessive retirement pay? These are the same unprincipled politicians who decide whether or not to bomb somebody into oblivion. 
Something isn't right here !

The military establishment has increasingly become a foreign policy tool of our politicians.  This was not the original intention. The Founding Fathers clearly divided the governmental powers into three separate units, and intended the military to be guided overall by them. The consensus of general direction was to emanate from the President, and the military to follow the overall political directions. Since the WWII the power to direct the war, without consulting  either the Congress or Senate, has been moved to the office of the President. 

This probably is not to the advantage of the Nation. Consider the unpopular war in Viet Nam. We watched as President Lyndon Johnson and Secretary Robert MacNamara ordered the military to carpet bomb and destroy Viet Nam. They were also responsible for killing and maiming thousands of innocent civilians. 

Forward a few years, and now we are involved in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt, and this time President Obama is calling the shots? Mr. Obama's Presidency has followed an unpopular Foreign Policy. Many of our citizens believe his administration to be the most incompetent of them all.  Mr. Obama is proud that he's been able to misdirect the military establishment, and proud that he has moved to destroy our relations with most of nations of the world - without the advice of the Congress or Senate or citizenry.  

There is something fundamentally wrong with this picture.


Popular posts from this blog

Intellectual / Incompetent / Liberal

We all know that there are serious problems with ou American political system. The federal government and national media have been telling us that we continue to lead the world in just about everything. Unfortunately, we do not. Measuring our status against other nations is difficult as it entails comparison of different attributes and characteristics. Comparisons are, at best, crude.  Surely, if we look, it's clear that America is no longer dominant among the world's communities. 

For decades following the 1929 economic depression, America has enriched foreign industries at the expense of our own. We have subsidized foreign military powers while allowing the depletion of our own. We've defended other nations borders while, at the same time, not defended our own. We've spent trillions of dollars to subsidize unworthy governments, and let our own infrastructure to fall into disrepair. 

The use of our economic power as a diplomatic tool may have been the correct thing to d…

Cruel and Thoughtless . . .

A disheartening situation has hit our family. A cousin, one that we don't know very well, has reached 93 years of age. Most of the Chapman family made it to the mid 80's, but Mary Lou Chapman has managed a few years more. And, she's not gone yet. Mary was unmarried her entire life. She grew up in a good home, was well educated, has always hd a good job, and has enjoyed pretty good health - until just a few years ago. While she is still very much alive, I sometimes speak in the past tense as if she had already died. Mary is either confused or in her own little world now. She began losing some of her sparkle a few years ago. At first it was mild memory loss, and then mild hearing loss, and then drifting in her speech as she lost track of what she wanted to say. Her Doctor said it was a mild dementia coming on with old age, and nothing to worry about yet. A few month's passed by before she began to have problems driving herself to the market and appointments and so forth,…

What Comes Next- And When

The speed of progress is astounding.  Watching television a few days ago I listened to Mark Cuban talk about subjects that I know little about. It was fascinating. He started with cars. Automatic cars. Driverless cars. Cars that think for themselves. All of which ended with a conversation about "artificial intelligence". Frankly, some of the discussion went right over my head. 
He began talking about the growth of computer knowledge and abilities that will result in the power to exponentially grow. Ultimately the amount of knowledge will exceed that of human beings. At that point "artificial intelligence" will control human beings. 

Mr. Cuban stopped there and asked "when this happens in the future, and it will, where will human beings fit in the composition of the universe".  
Several brilliant minds have been working on the answer but no consensus exists - except one. The transition from the dominance of human beings on earth will end will be be replaced b…