Skip to main content

Our Climate Is Warming ?

It's December and cold days have returned and make an appropriate counterpoint to the Climate Change Conference being held in Europe. Most nations have representatives at the conference who, in turn, are advised experts on the subject. Interestingly, they are all  avoiding a few specific facts in order to promote the urgency of Climate Change. 

1.   Why do they so carefully avoid saying that there is no consensus that anything unusual is happening?


2.   Many meteorologists (and other scientists) believe our planet may not be warming (or cooling) any faster than it has during it's entire known history.  


3.    Human beings, with their industries and synthetic chemicals probably influence our climate to some degree but most informed people question the amount. 


4.    Antarctica is getting cooler, not warmer. 

5.    Western Antarctica ice  is melting - but is offset by the cooling of ice on the Eastern side. 

6.    Melting sea ice doesn't raise the water level of the ocean. The ice is already in the ocean. 

7.    Only ice melting sheets & polar cap ice that is over land can raise sea levels.

8.    Long before the protective ozone layer formed 300 million years ago, life could not emerge from the oceans without being fried. The earth had to have cooled. 

9.    North America and Europe experienced cool weather from 1500 to 1800, and the time period became known as the Little Ice Age. 

10.   During the winter of the mid 1600's the Baltic Sea froze over, allowing people to walk from Poland to Sweden across the ice. 

11.   During the winter of 1780, New York Harbor froze over, allowing people to walk from Manhattan to Staten Island, and that's not so long ago.

At the Climate Change Conference they formally adopt the (existing) goal of limiting global warming by 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial times. They have concluded that the goal can be reached by reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The idea of de-carbonization is something that has appeared recently. It's meaning has not yet been defined. A few experts say it means that there has to be a sharp reduction of carbon emissions from the burning of fossil fuels. Is this truly an emergency?

Stay tuned.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon