Skip to main content

America Sliding To Failure

Be forewarned. My modest knowledge of history is on the surface only.  I've no real depth of scholarship. What follows is a simple set of recollections.

I was very young when F.D.R. was President and the European war was gearing up. The industrial revolution was in full swing, and the war in Europe was threatening.  Sometime, perhaps it was about then, the American work force started to move faster to the cities to take factory jobs.  Rural America was fading while industrial America was waking up.

IMMIGRATION
In the early 19th century Europe, particularly England, was enduring hard times. The King's laws and onerous taxation was bitterly opposed. Work was hard to find. Money and food was scarce. Moving to another land offered a chance to escape and America seemed to offer the most opportunity. At the same time there was a strong movement of people in search of religious freedom. The Catholic and Protestant split probably started the movement, but it became a general challenge of religious and theological ideas. Serious differences developed between factions. New Protestant denominations were born. The pressure to achieve the freedom to worship was fierce. All of these things contributed to the increasingly relentless immigration to the new world. 

CONTRADICTORY FORCES
The King of England faced a double edged sword. On the one hand he wanted and encouraged the people to leave England thereby reducing the huge demand for public welfare. On the other hand he wanted to retain the ability to tax any future success the immigrants might have. He ultimately failed, the American Revolution of 1776 and the subsequent Declaration of Independence sealed the deal.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
The immigrants set out to establish a new kind of government in America. It was  to be crafted in a way that every citizen could participate by voting for a  government divided into three separate and equal divisions. The concept required any two of the divisions to watch over the third. The founding fathers described this in detail in the Constitution,  Bill of Rights, and other founding documents. Most importantly, there was to be freedom and opportunity for every new citizen. The new federal government was to grant:   
  • Every citizen the right to own property, 
  • The freedom to observe his or her chosen religion, 
  • A free market monetary system.
  • Protection of freedoms, rights, and property by the federal government. 
It was also decreed that Church and State were to be firmly separated to protect religious freedom for all, and the government from religious interference.

THE PROGRESSIVE WING OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
The Far Left Progressives are making a general assault on liberty in the name of an alliance between secularism and statism. It's well beyond the more ridiculous  political correctness that began the assault. It is now a concerted effort to remove our existing federal government, increase the size and control of the successor government, install social democracy and eventually have a federal state structure much like communism. 

Yes, it is happening now.
No, I am not a radical conservative

The far left dominates our media, entertainment industry, universities, metropolitan areas, and the DEMOCRATIC PARTY. It's a fact. The Democrats pride themselves on a devotion to equality which  they consider the foremost demand of social justice. This supposition is not correct. The question is not whether equality is good, but which forms of equality are morally relevant and which should the government protect.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon