Skip to main content

And Our Kool Aid Leadership Fails

WHILE WE GO DOWN IN FLAMES HE PLAYS GOLF
SMILE BEFORE IT GETS WORSE


Like most of you I am up to my eyeballs in nasty political rhetoric. The extremes of partisan politics are tearing us apart - and doing great harm to America in the process.  Most of the vehement anger is between:

    [ULTRA LEFT LIBERAL DEMOCRATS]
                         and
[FAR RIGHT CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS]

The extremes of neither party offer a workable system of government.
  
LIBERAL-SOCIALISTS   vs   CONSERVATIVE-LIBERTARIANS

The differences between these two groups have divided our government  into hostile partisan  camps at a time that our WORLD is rapidly becoming more dangerous. America should be presenting a strong and UNITED front. Not everyone in other countries realizes that most Americans gravitate toward the middle in respect to their politics. Most Americans follow neither extreme. They are proud that they can have civil discussions and debates about their political opinions.

The people of other countries, blinded by the spectacular rhetoric of the extremes in American politics, do not envision America as a nation with common principles. They do not realize that most Americans are not as politically disunited as it would seem.

PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS LEAVE UNFINISHED WORK

When a President leaves office and a new President steps in, the transition has always been peaceful  despite the carry over of unfinished legislation and unwanted decisions. Once the new administration is settled in, it is normal that the voters rarely hear anything good about the previous administration. The new guys endeavor to blame the old ones for every problem. Sometimes, perish the thought, they even embellish the failures of the previous administration. The current Obama people, for example, have carried this ["BLAME THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION"] excuse to a new low.  


Mr. Obama told voters "It's a choice between the policies that led us into this mess and the policies that are leading us out of this mess."  Okay. What exactly were the policies that created this mess?  He complained that most of the mess resulted from tax cuts. When he  took office he had the power to cancel them, but he didn't. Why?

Mr. Obama told the voters "The tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 CAUSED the housing crash in 2007 and 2008."   Okay. There is no evidence that this is true. None. The statement was just another attempt to blame the previous administration for the collapse. 

THE OBAMOBILE 2010

Mr. Obama told the voters "The Bush tax cuts fueled the out of control deficit?"  Okay. Mr. Obama did not explain that while it is true that in 2007 the deficit was about $165 Billion Dollars when Mr. Bush took office and over ONE TRILLION dollars when he left office, it is a fact that the Obama administration immediately INCREASED the deficit to over $13 TRILLION dollars by massive spending on entitlement programs. The Obama administration told Americans that: "Deficits were better than surpluses in a down economy."  America is now on the edge of bankruptcy and Mr. Bush had little or nothing to do with it. Mr. Obama and his administration did. 

As for the housing bust, in 1999 and important bi-partisan financial deregulation was signed into law by President Clinton. It was the result of the rising housing bubble and bust. Mr. Obama has attempted, over and over again,  to blame this legislation on Mr. Bush. He continues to do so despite knowing that Mr. Bush was not even in office at the time.  
Interestingly, Mr. Obama knows that the real reason for the housing bust was that
"Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Ben Bernanke, FAILED to increase interest rates fast enough."  Why then did Mr. Obama retain and promote Ben Bernanke to be the Federal Reserve Board Chairman?"  Curious, isn't it.


Another curiosity. The housing bust was followed by the banking industry bust, and it was NOT anticipated by Mr. Timothy Geithner, who was then the head of the New York Federal Bank (which oversees the Wall Street Stock Market). Mr. Geithner had failed to foresee, stabilize, protect and prevent bank failures and a stock market collapse. That was his job. Knowing this, why did Mr. Obama retain and promote Tim Geithner to be the National Treasury Secretary?"
    
Rhetorical: Doesn't this sound like the inmates are running the asylum?




End

Comments

Greybeard said…
Trivialities Bump, but I think the spelling is "Bernanke" and "Geithner".

I think at some point we'll take a look back at this administration and see the MOST CORRUPT actions of any administration of our lifetime.
Watch and see.

Popular posts from this blog

Gloves Off

. OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS BETRAYED OUR TRUST AGAIN. Whether we are Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative, makes no difference at all. Our legislators voted according to "what's best for them". It was clear that the people want to reduce the costs and improve access to our overall health care system. It was also VERY CLEAR that they did not want the 2000 page legislative monstrosity that was produced by a small number of far left liberal Democrats, who worked behind closed doors to fashion a pork filled blunderbuss that virtually no one has been able to read, or discuss, or debate, or offer alternatives to specific unreasoned clauses. It is (now) a BAD BILL , passed by BAD POLITICIANS, that compose a BAD MINORITY segment of America's out-of-control government. AND WE HAVE NO LOGICAL WAY TO PAY FOR IT EITHER. The far left liberals like to point at  SOCIAL SECURITY   as a text book success. They are wrong and will not admit it despite the concrete evide

Why Blackwater Mercenaries

Over some years the name Blackwater shows  up in the news. It is, by their own estimation, the largest mercenary group in the world. I think I first noticed it when reports from Iraq mentioned they were employed (by whom?) to escort and protect members of the Iraqi government from place to place. Then I became aware that they had joined several of the firefights between our marines and Iraqi enemies. I wondered just how these mercenaries (that supposedly came from the United States) were  hired by someone (who?) to fight? That led to the question of just who would be responsible if a situation involved the accidental killing of an innocent bystander? It  might be a little sticky for an unauthorised mercenary contracted by the United States but not a member of our military forces.  Or suppose a Blackwater type killed a military Iraqi combatant and was then captured by the enemy. Would he be treated as a spy, or as a American combatant, or whatelse?  And would the Geneva Convention

Sarah-palin-itus

. Am I the only one that watches the liberal roar caused by the soccer mom . . . and laughs?   I suspect Sarah is a nice and decent person who will eventually prove to be a better political critic than elected official. But who knows. She projects an effervescent personality, a better than average intelligence, and solid conservative values. Still,  as a political leader of consequence I suspect she is a female Peter. You do remember THE PETER PRINCIPLE don't you. Dixon